Home » Posts tagged 'Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents' (Page 9)
Tag Archives: Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents
NSF Diagnosis made 10 years after patient’s last dose of contrast
On May 27, 2015, JAMA Dermatology published a Case Report by Larson et al that described a biopsy-confirmed case of “Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis Manifesting a Decade after Exposure to Gadolinium”. According to the report, a long-term hemodialysis patient was exposed to a gadolinium-based contrast agent several times between 1998 and 2004 during magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of his abdominal vessels and arteriovenous fistula. Ten years later, in 2014, he developed new dermal papules and plaques. The diagnosis of NSF was made based on the findings of a biopsy of affected skin which showed thickening of collagen, CD34+ spindle cells, and increased mucin in the dermis. (Information about the agent(s) and dosages are not provided).
Prior to this case, the authors noted that the longest documented time after exposure to gadolinium to NSF manifestation was 3 ½ years.
This case shows that even in patients with severe renal disease retained gadolinium can take many years before causing “visible” evidence of a problem. The authors concluded that, “Although the use of gadolinium contrast agents in patients with kidney failure has markedly decreased, patients with exposure to gadolinium years to decades previously may manifest the disease”. (more…)
FDA action is urgently needed on MRI contrast agent safety issues
Editorial – I believe the FDA needs to do more to regulate the use of linear and macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents administered for enhanced MRIs and MRAs.
Since January 2014, I am aware of nine studies that have reported finding evidence of gadolinium deposition within the brain tissues of patients exposed to gadolinium-based contrast agents or GBCAs. In most of those studies, the patients did not have severe renal disease, in fact, most were described as having “normal renal function” or an eGFR >60. Despite the increasing number of new studies that indicate that gadolinium is remaining in the brain, some still question whether there is any clinical significance. Speaking as someone who has been adversely affected by retained gadolinium, I believe that there is clinical significance, and I am not alone. Members of our MRI-Gadolinium-Toxicity support group have reported symptoms that are consistent with what is known about the toxic effects of gadolinium. Since we released the results of our 2014 Survey of the Chronic Effects of Retained Gadolinium from Contrast MRIs, our support group has almost tripled in size and another affected patient recently started a group on Facebook. I believe the problems related to gadolinium retention are significant, but they are not being recognized. (more…)
Study reports Increasing Signal Intensity within the Brains of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis after multiple injections of the macrocyclic GBCA Gadovist – All Patients had Normal Renal Function
On June 25, 2015, European Radiology published a new study online ahead of print that reports increasing signal intensity on brain MR images after repeated administrations of the macrocyclic agent, gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany). The study by Stojanov et al is titled, Increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W magnetic resonance images in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: correlation with cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, gadobutrol. This is the first study to report a correlation between the cumulative dose of a macrocyclic, gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), and gadolinium deposition within the dentate nucleus (DN) and globus pallidus (GP) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). All patients had normal renal function at the beginning and end of the study.
Liver function was also normal at the beginning of the study; however, the authors noted that at the end of the study there was a significant increase (p=0.004) in GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. The other liver function parameters remained normal.
Since all patients had normal renal function at the beginning and end of the study, there was no correlation between renal function and signal intensity within either dentate nucleus or globus pallidus. The authors noted that, “This suggests that gadolinium deposition within the brain may occur even in patients with normal renal function”. (more…)
Study suggests Gadolinium Deposition in Dentate Nucleus with MultiHance – Patients had normal renal function
Another 2015 study in Radiology reports findings consistent with gadolinium deposition within the brains of patients with normal renal function (eGFR >60). The study by Ramalho et al, High Signal Intensity in Globus Pallidus and Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Evaluation of Two Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents”, compared gadodiamide (Omniscan) and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance). The findings related to multiple administrations of gadodiamide are “in agreement with other investigators, who documented signal intensity changes associated with this contrast agent despite the presence of normal renal function”. The authors also reported that, “A significant trend toward relative change in signal intensity was seen in the dentate nucleus (DN), but not in the globus pallidus (GP) after serial applications of gadobenate dimeglumine, suggesting that some gadolinium deposition also may occur with this agent”.
For the first time in the literature, the study established gadolinium accumulation related to the use of gadobenate dimeglumine, which is better known as MultiHance. Of note is the fact that there are no unconfounded cases of NSF associated with the linear ionic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), MultiHance. However, in this study, the patients in each group had received only one brand of GBCA. Group 1 was comprised of 23 patients that had received between 3 and 11 doses of Omniscan, and Group 2 included 46 patients that had received between 3 and 11 doses of MultiHance. All patients had normal liver and renal function. (more…)