Gadolinium Toxicity

Home » Background » Background on Risk Factors

Background on Risk Factors

Breaking News


March 10, 2017 - European group recommends to stop using 4 linear GBCAs Read all about it.

February 27, 2017 - New Study Reports Gadolinium Retention in 70 Cases with Normal Kidney Function. Read all about it.

(This Page can be downloaded as a PDF.)

To better understand what has been published about the risk factors related to Gadolinium retention, you have to remember that much of the research has been focused on trying to determine why patients with severe renal impairment developed Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) after having MRIs with a Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent (GBCA). While some risk factors are specific to those with renal impairment or liver failure, many risk factors could apply to all GBCA-exposed patients.  Our focus will be on those risk factors for Gadolinium retention that have the potential to affect all patients.

Note that the long-term effects of retained Gadolinium are still unknown and cumulative dosage is considered by some researchers to pose a long-term risk to potentially everyone at some point in the future, including patients with normal renal (kidney) function.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]

1% Retention Factor

It appears that just having an MRI or MRA with contrast may put everyone at risk of retaining at least some of the toxic Gadolinium ion. It has been estimated that approximately 1% or 15 mg of the 1.5 grams of Gadolinium (Gd) contained in each standard dose of contrast (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) may be retained in the body where it will be deposited primarily in bone.[7],[8] A 2004 study by Gibby et al found that Gadolinium was deposited in bone tissue removed from patients with normal renal function within four days of GBCA administration.[9] A 2009 study by Darrah et al confirmed incorporation of Gadolinium into bone where it was retained for longer than 8-years after GBCA exposure.[10]

Impaired Renal Function

The primary risk factor for Gadolinium retention is having severely impaired renal function, meaning having an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30.[11]  Since GBCAs are cleared from the body primarily via the kidneys, poor kidney function causes the GBCA to remain in the body for a much longer period of time.  That increases the risk of the Gadolinium ion and ligand separating which results in large quantities of toxic Gadolinium being retained in the body. [12] The end result can be NSF.

Stability of the Agent, Cumulative Dosage and High Dosage

Besides impaired renal function, the stability of the contrast agent that is administered as well as cumulative dosage and high dosage also contribute to retention of Gadolinium from the GBCA.[9],[13] The linear GBCAs Omniscan, Optimark and Magnevist are considered to be the least stable; however, there are cases of NSF linked to macrocyclic agents as well. (See Background on GBCAs for details.)

While the literature says these are contributing factors for NSF in the renally-impaired, the urine test results presented in our Self-Study of Retained Gadolinium and Appendix 1 of our Symptom Survey Report indicate that they may also cause Gadolinium retention in patients with normal renal function (meaning eGFR >60).  Although our papers have not been published in medical journals, they are factual and supported by findings in the published, peer-reviewed literature.

Altered Blood-Brain Barrier

Another risk factor for Gadolinium retention that seems to be somewhat overlooked is having a compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB). The presence of a tumor or lesion, or anything that alters the blood-brain barrier can result in Gadolinium being deposited in brain tissue regardless of the patient’s level of renal function.  GBCA product labeling indicates that Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents “do not cross an intact blood-brain barrier”; however, “disruption of the blood-brain barrier” or “abnormal vascularity” allows accumulation in lesions such as neoplasms (tumors), abscesses, and subacute infarcts.[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22]

There is growing evidence of deposited Gadolinium remaining in brain tissue.[23],[24],[25] Two recent studies involving patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or brain metastases reported increasing signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images of the brain within the Dentate Nucleus after multiple contrast-enhanced MRIs – including in patients with normal renal function.[26],[27]

Besides the presence of a tumor or lesion, there appear to be many other ways that the blood-brain barrier might be crossed or temporarily altered. Whenever that occurs, the risk of Gadolinium being retained in brain tissue may be increased.  See Background on Gadolinium for more details about blood-brain barrier disruption.


Other than renal impairment, researchers have said that transmetallation presents the greatest potential risk for the release of the toxic metal ion from the chelate.[28],[29]  Transmetallation is the displacement of the Gadolinium ion (Gd 3+) from the chelate (ligand) by other metal ions in the body such as zinc, calcium, copper and iron.[5] The metals can work at the same time to destabilize the GBCA complex which can result in Gadolinium remaining in the body.

Since at least 1992, dechelation or separation of the ion and ligand due to transmetallation and acid dissociation was confirmed in animal studies.[30],[31],[32]  Transmetallation can and has occurred in people with normal renal function. [33],[34],[35]

The risk of transmetallation appears to be greater with the nonionic, linear GBCAs – Omniscan and Optimark. [36],[37] However, all linear GBCAs are considered to be less stable than the macrocyclic agents.[38],[39],[40]  (See Background on GBCAs for more details.)


Extravasation occurs during the intravenous injection of the Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent. The administered GBCA is accidentally injected into the surrounding soft tissue instead of directly into the vein.  Extravasation can cause edema, inflammation, and necrosis of the tissue. [12],[41] Besides damaging the tissue, that portion of the GBCA dosage that was directly deposited in tissue could result in Gadolinium retention.

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

An Acute Kidney Injury or AKI is a common clinical problem and often occurs in the elderly, and during hospitalizations and after surgeries.[42] GBCAs were thought to be safer to use in the renally-impaired; however, that has not proven to be the case. Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents were found to be more nephrotoxic than iodinated contrast media in equivalent X-ray attenuating doses.[43],[44]

Some of the causes of AKI include the use of radiocontrast dyes, diuretics, NSAIDs, ACE Inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, Statins, Fluoroquinolones, and Tetracyclines.[45]

There are conflicting reports regarding the nephrotoxic effects of GBCAs.[46]  However, in 2006, Akgun et al reported the first renal biopsy of a patient with acute renal failure associated with a GBCA to emphasize their potential nephrotoxicity.[47]  Note that acute renal failure (ARF) is now known as acute kidney injury (AKI).


Acidosis is a condition in which the body has more acid than normal. This can cause the pH of the blood and body tissues to fall below the healthy range of 7.35-7.45. Some of the causes of acidosis include: high protein diets, excess coffee and alcohol consumption, chronic disease, toxic exposure, certain medications, prolonged vigorous exercise, diabetes, cancer, dehydration, low blood sugar, poor digestion, the normal process of aging, liver failure, and kidney disease.[48] It is well established that the rate of Gadolinium release increases with decreasing pH.[49]

Proinflammatory Event

The occurrence of a proinflammatory event near the time of your contrast-enhanced MRI or MRA can increase your risk of retaining Gadolinium from the administered GBCA.  Proinflammatory events include recent surgery, infection, vascular procedures or thrombosis.[50]

The Bottom Line

As you can see, there are many factors that could result in a patient retaining varying amounts of Gadolinium from the Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent regardless of his or her level of renal function. What is not clear is why some patients become symptomatic while others do not. It remains to be seen if those patients will become symptomatic at some later point in time or after additional doses of contrast.  It is possible that some patients attribute their symptoms to whatever condition caused them to have a contrast-enhanced MRI or MRA.

If you have unexplained symptoms that you believe were caused by retained Gadolinium from a contrast MRI or MRA, please report it to the FDA by filing a MedWatch Adverse Event Report. Call 1-800-FDA-1088 or report via the FDA website at

When filing a report online, remember that Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents are considered prescription medications or drugs.

Patients outside the U.S. should report to their country’s equivalent governing agency.


[1] Abraham, J. L., Thakral, C., Skov, L., Rossen, K., & Marckmann, P. (2008). Dermal inorganic gadolinium concentrations: evidence for in vivo transmetallation and long-term persistence in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The British Journal of Dermatology, 158(2), 273–80. doi:DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08335.x  Retrieved from

[2] Thomsen, H. S. (2008). Is NSF only the tip of the “gadolinium toxicity” iceberg? Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI, 28(2), 284–6. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21478. Retrieved from

[3] Thakral, C., Alhariri, J., & Abraham, J. L. (2007). Long-term retention of gadolinium in tissues from nephrogenic systemic fibrosis patient after multiple gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans: case report and implications. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, 2(4), 199–205. doi:10.1002/cmmi.146. Retrieved from

[4] Abraham, J. L., & Thakral, C. (2008). Tissue distribution and kinetics of gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. European Journal of Radiology, 66(2), 200–7.  DOI: Retrieved from

[5] Thakral, C., & Abraham, J. L. (2009). Gadolinium-induced nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is associated with insoluble Gd deposits in tissues: in vivo transmetallation confirmed by microanalysis. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, 36(12), 1244–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2009.01283.x  Retrieved from

[6] Morcos, S. K., & Haylor, J. (2010). Pathophysiology of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: A review of experimental data. World Journal of Radiology, 2(11), 427–33. Retrieved from

[7] Abraham, J., & SUNY Upstate Medical University. (2008). Gadolinium (Gd) and Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: Analytical Studies. SUNY website. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from

[8] Abraham, J. L. (2011). Author Interview Jerrold L. Abraham, MD – Multiorgan Gadolinium Deposition and Fibrosis in a patient with Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis – an autopsy-based review. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from

[9] Gibby, W. A., Gibby, K. A., & Gibby, W. A. (2004). Comparison of Gd DTPA-BMA (Omniscan) versus Gd HP-DO3A (ProHance) retention in human bone tissue by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Investigative Radiology, 39(3), 138–42. Retrieved from

[10] Darrah, T. H., Prutsman-Pfeiffer, J. J., Poreda, R. J., Ellen Campbell, M., Hauschka, P. V, & Hannigan, R. E. (2009). Incorporation of excess gadolinium into human bone from medical contrast agents. Metallomics : integrated biometal science, 1(6), 479–88. Retrieved from

[11] Kribben, A., Witzke, O., Hillen, U., Barkhausen, J., Daul, A. E., & Erbel, R. (2009). Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(18), 1621–8. Retrieved from

[12] Ersoy, H., & Rybicki, F. J. (2007). Biochemical safety profiles of gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI, 26(5), 1190–7. Retrieved from

[13] Tweedle, M. F., Kanal, E., & Muller, R. N. (2014). Considerations in the Selection of a New Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent. Applied Radiology, May Supple, 1–11. Retrieved from

[14] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. (2012). Magnevist Package Insert 2012.pdf. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from

[15] GE Healthcare. (2010). OMNISCAN Product Labeling. December 2010. (020123s037lbl.pdf). Retrieved October 15, 2012, from

[16] Mallinckrodt Inc. (2010). Optimark Product Labeling 2010. (020937s016lbl.pdf ). Retrieved October 15, 2012, from

[17] Bracco Diagnostics Inc. (2010). ProHance Product Labeling 2010. (020131s024lbl.pdf ). Retrieved October 20, 2012, from

[18] Bracco Diagnostics Inc. (2012). MultiHance Product Labeling 2012. 021357s011lbl.pdf. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from

[19] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. Gadavist Product Labeling (2013) (201277s003lbl.pdf). Retrieved September 25, 2014, from

[20] Guerbet. DOTAREM Product Labeling (2013) LABEL – 204781s000lbl.pdf. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from

[21] Lantheus Medical Imaging. (2010). ABLAVAR Product Labeling 2010. (021711s003lbl.pdf). Retrieved October 15, 2012, from

[22] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. (2011). EOVIST Product Labeling 2011 (2011022090s005lbl.pdf). Retrieved October 15, 2012, from

[23] Xia, D., Davis, R. L., Crawford, J. A., & Abraham, J. L. (2010). Gadolinium released from MR contrast agents is deposited in brain tumors: in situ demonstration using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Acta Radiologica , 51 (10 ), 1126–1136. doi:10.3109/02841851.2010.515614.  Retrieved from

[24] Fulciniti, M., et al, & Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School. (2009). Gadolinium Containig Contrast Agent Promotes Multiple Myeloma Cell Growth: Implications for Clinical Use of MRI in Myeloma (poster presentation). Retrieved from

[25] Sanyal, S., Marckmann, P., Scherer, S., & Abraham, J. (2011). Multiorgan gadolinium (Gd) deposition and fibrosis in a patient with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis – an autopsy-based review. Nephrology Dialysis Transplant, (0), 1–11. Retrieved from

[26] Errante, Y., Cirimele, V., Mallio, C. A., Di Lazzaro, V., Zobel, B. B., & Quattrocchi, C. C. (2014). Progressive Increase of T1 Signal Intensity of the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced Magnetic Resonance Images Is Associated With Cumulative Doses of Intravenously Administered Gadodiamide in Patients With Normal Renal Function, Suggesting Dechelation. Investigative Radiology, 49(10), 685-690. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000072.  Retrieved from

[27] Kanda, T., Ishii, K., Kawaguchi, H., Kitajima, K., & Takenaka, D. (2013). High Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Relationship with Increasing Cumulative Dose of a Gadolinium-based Contrast Material. Radiology, 131669. doi:10.1148/radiol.13131669.  Retrieved from

[28] Rocklage, S. M., Worah, D., & Kim, S.-H. (1991). Metal ion release from paramagnetic chelates: What is tolerable? Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 22(2), 216–221. Retrieved from;jsessionid=8594CFB7292E5B673D701CD7E5122186.f01t01

[29] Cacheris, W. P., Quay, S. C., & Rocklage, S. M. (1990). The relationship between thermodynamics and the toxicity of gadolinium complexes. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 8(4), 467–481. Retrieved from

[30] Kasokat, T., & Urich, K. (1992). Quantification of dechelation of gadopentetate dimeglumine in rats. Arzneimittel-Forschung, 42(6), 869–76. Retrieved from

[31] Corot, C., Idee, J. M., Hentsch, A. M., Santus, R., Mallet, C., Goulas, V., Bonnemain, B., et al. (n.d.). Structure-activity relationship of macrocyclic and linear gadolinium chelates: investigation of transmetallation effect on the zinc-dependent metallopeptidase angiotensin-converting enzyme. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 8(3), 695–702. Retrieved from

[32] Idée, J.-M., Port, M., Raynal, I., Schaefer, M., Le Greneur, S., & Corot, C. (2006). Clinical and biological consequences of transmetallation induced by contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 20(6), 563–576. Retrieved from

[33] Puttagunta, N. R., Gibby, W. A., & Smith, G. T. (1996). Human in vivo comparative study of zinc and copper transmetallation after administration of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Investigative Radiology, 31(12), 739–42. Retrieved from

[34] Kimura, J., Ishiguchi, T., Matsuda, J., Ohno, R., Nakamura, A., Kamei, S., Ohno, K., et al. (2005). Human comparative study of zinc and copper excretion via urine after administration of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Radiation Medicine, 23(5), 322–6. Retrieved from

[35] Greenberg, S. A. (2010). Zinc transmetallation and gadolinium retention after MR imaging: case report. Radiology, 257(3), 670–3. Retrieved from

[36] Frenzel, T., Lengsfeld, P., Schirmer, H., Hütter, J., & Weinmann, H.-J. (2008). Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C. Investigative Radiology, 43(12), 817–28. Retrieved from

[37] Prince, M., & et al. (2003). Gadodiamide Administration Causes Spuriour Hypocalcemia. Radiology. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from

[38] Tweedle, M. F., Wedeking, P., & Kumar, K. (1995). Biodistribution of radiolabeled, formulated gadopentetate, gadoteridol, gadoterate, and gadodiamide in mice and rats. Investigative Radiology, 30(6), 372–80. Retrieved from

[39] Morcos, S. K. (2008). Extracellular gadolinium contrast agents: differences in stability. European journal of radiology, 66(2), 175–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.025. Retrieved from

[40] Rofsky, N. M., Sherry, A. D., & Lenkinski, R. E. (2008). Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a chemical perspective. Radiology, 247(3), 608–12. Retrieved from

[41] Runge, V. M., Dickey, K. M., Williams, N. M., & Peng, X. (2002). Local tissue toxicity in response to extravascular extravasation of magnetic resonance contrast media. Investigative radiology, 37(7), 393–8. Retrieved from

[42] Soni, S. S., Ronco, C., Katz, N., & Cruz, D. N. (2009). Early diagnosis of acute kidney injury: the promise of novel biomarkers. Blood purification, 28(3), 165–74. doi:10.1159/000227785  Retrieved from

[43] Thomsen, H. S., & et al. (2002). Gadolinium-containing Contrast Media for Radiographic Examinations: A Position Paper. European radiology, (12), 2600–2605. Retrieved from

[44] Heinrich, M. C., Kuhlmann, M. K., Kohlbacher, S., Scheer, M., Grgic, A., Heckmann, M. B., & Uder, M. (n.d.). Cytotoxicity of Iodinated and Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents in Renal Tubular Cells at Angiographic Concentrations: In Vitro Study. Radiology, 242(2), 425–434. Retrieved from

[45] Howell, H. R., Brundige, M. L., & Langworthy, L. (2007). Drug-Induced Acute Renal Failure. U.S. Pharmacist. Retrieved September 27, 2014, from,urology

[46] Perazella, M. A. (2009). Current status of gadolinium toxicity in patients with kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 4(2), 461–9. Retrieved from

[47] Akgun, H., Gonlusen, G., Joiner Cartwright, J., Suki, W. N., & Truong, L. D. (2009). Are Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media Nephrotoxic?: A Renal Biopsy Study. Retrieved from;2

[48] McNaughton, C. (2004). Metabolic Acidosis.pdf. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from

[49] Aime, S., & Caravan, P. (2009). Biodistribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents, including gadolinium deposition. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(6), 1259–1267. Retrieved from

[50] Sadowski, E. A., Bennett, L. K., Chan, M. R., Wentland, A. L., Garrett, A. L., Garrett, R. W., & Djamali, A. (2007). Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology, 243(1), 148–57. Retrieved from



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: