Gadolinium Toxicity

Home » News (Page 11)

Category Archives: News

Enter your email address to follow our News and Viewpoints Blog and receive email notifications of new posts.

Twitter feed of #MRIsafety

The Twitter feed below is about MRI Safety (#MRIsafety). MRI Safety is a larger topic than just the safety of Contrast Agents. Much of it is regarding the strong magnetic fields attracting metallic objects. You will find tweets from people who are concerned about Gadolinium Based Contrast Agents.

More evidence of gadolinium deposition in children’s brains

Three recent retrospective studies have reported finding evidence of increased signal intensities in the brains of pediatric patients who had undergone multiple MRIs with a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA).  The studies by Hu et al, Roberts et al, and Flood et al, add to the mounting evidence of gadolinium deposition in the brain of both children and adults exposed to GBCAs.

The study by Hu et al involved 21 patients, each of whom received multiple MRI exams with a GBCA over the course of their medical treatment.  The number of exams ranged from 5 to 37 (19 out of 21 had more than 6 serial GBCA MRI exams), and the duration of treatment from first to most recent exam ranged from 1.2 to 12.9 years.  The patients were between 0.9 and 14.4 years of age at the time of their first GBCA exam.  Signal intensity ratios in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus increased between the first and most recent MRI exam in all 21 patients receiving a GBCA.

The authors concluded that the data provided supports the growing evidence of potential gadolinium deposition in the brain.  The observation of signal intensity increases in the dentate nucleus and the globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted images are consistent with prior studies in adults.  They noted that “additional studies are warranted to determine whether intracranial gadolinium deposition is the source responsible for these hyperintense structures and whether changes in standard practice of care are needed”.

Hu, H. H., Pokorney, A., Towbin, R. B., & Miller, J. H. (2016). Increased signal intensities in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted images: evidence in children undergoing multiple gadolinium MRI exams. Pediatric Radiology, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3646-3

Roberts et al found that the number of prior gadolinium-based contrast agent doses in pediatric patients is significantly correlated with progressive T1-weighted dentate hyperintensity.  Sixteen pediatric patients were included for analysis.  The patient ages ranged from 2 months to 14 years at the time of the first contrast dose.  The number of doses before the last brain MR imaging examined ranged from 4 to 16.  Hyperintensity was visible within the dentate nucleus on unenhanced images in the patients who had received at least 7 prior doses of GBCA.

The authors note that “pathologic evaluation of the brain in patients with normal renal function who were administered GBCAs has shown that gadolinium is deposited not only in the dentate nucleus but throughout the brain, including the frontal lobe white matter and frontal cortex”.  “While the clinical significance of the long-term retention of gadolinium in the brain is unknown, it is particularly concerning for pediatric patients, who are undergoing neurodevelopment.” (more…)

Initial publication of symptoms of gadolinium toxicity

The results of a 9 question survey about gadolinium exposure and related symptoms in patients with normal renal function were reported in an article by Burke et al titled Self-reported gadolinium toxicity: A survey of patients with chronic symptoms.  The survey provides the initial description in the medical literature of patients with normal renal function who self-described toxicity related to administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).  There were 50 respondents to the anonymous online survey.  All 50 respondents (100%) received gadolinium-based contrast with an average of 4.2 doses.  All 50 attribute their symptoms to gadolinium exposure.

Thirty-three (66%) subjects described the onset of symptoms immediately following GBCA administration and 16 (32%) within 6 weeks.  The most common symptoms included bone/joint pain and head/neck symptoms including headache, vision change, and hearing change.  Headache and bone/joint pain was described by more than 75% of the cases.  Skin changes were seen in approximately 60% of respondents.

Other symptoms reported include: flu-like symptoms (30.6%); digestive symptoms described as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea (46.9%); chest symptoms described as difficulty breathing (42.9%); generalized whole body symptoms (30.6%); and other (75.5%).

The findings of the survey showed that subjects with normal renal function might develop disease following administration of the majority of GBCAs including macrocyclic agents.

Despite the limitations of the survey, the authors said that it was their opinion “that there most likely is toxicity associated with GBCA administration in patients with normal renal function”.  They concluded that, “at the very least, this study highlights the need to further investigate the subject of patients with normal renal function who complain of severe long-lasting symptomatology following GBCA administration”.

My thoughts –
When Hubbs Grimm and I released the findings of the online symptom survey that we conducted in early 2014, we noted that the results presented in our paper should stimulate further professional investigation into gadolinium retention in all patient populations including those with normal renal function.  It is good to see that the medical community is now looking into the issue of gadolinium retention in patients with normal renal function further.

Our paper, Gadolinium Toxicity – A Survey of the Chronic Effects of Retained Gadolinium from Contrast MRIs can be found in the Research section of our website.

Sharon Williams

____________________________________________________________________

Burke, L. M. B., Ramalho, M., AlObaidy, M., Chang, E., Jay, M., & Semelka, R. C. (2016). Self-Reported Gadolinium Toxicity: A Survey of Patients with Chronic Symptoms. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2016.05.005

Could Sugar replace Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents used for MRIs?

Animal studies have shown that D-glucose is a potential biodegradable MRI contrast agent for imaging glucose uptake in tumors.  According to findings reported by Xu et al in “Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) MRI: Translation to Human Scanning and First Results in Glioma Patients”, dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) imaging is feasible in humans.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI was used to image dynamic signal changes in the human brain at 7 Tesla (7T) during and after infusion of D-glucose (sugar).

DGE image data from 4 normal volunteers and 3 glioma patients showed strong signal enhancement in blood vessels, while the enhancement varied spatially over the tumor.  The authors noted that the areas of enhancement differed spatially between DGE and conventional Gd-enhanced imaging, suggesting complementary image information content for these two types of agents.

The researchers concluded that it was possible to detect water signal changes in the human brain induced by infusion of D-glucose.  They said that the signal changes are due to glucose uptake in vessels, the brain and tumor tissue areas, and are related to the kinetics of delivery, transport and metabolism of D-glucose.  They noted that an interesting finding is that different tumor areas showed varying times of enhancement, which suggests that the dynamic time curves may contain information about blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability.

According to the study authors, a larger human study is needed, and for DGE to become relevant clinically, it would have to be possible at 3 Tesla and preferably also at 1.5 Tesla.

Why this is important for patients –  (more…)

Gadolinium Deposition Disease – Part of a Family of Disorders

Important News for Patients who have retained gadolinium –
A recently published article by UNC Radiologist Dr. Richard Semelka and his colleagues proposes naming the histopathologically proven presence of gadolinium in brain tissue “gadolinium storage condition”, and it describes a new entity that represents symptomatic deposition of gadolinium in individuals with normal renal function, for which they propose the designation “gadolinium deposition disease”.  The article titled: Gadolinium in Humans: A Family of Disorders, was published in AJR online.

The article is not freely available to the public at this time.   Because of that, I will provide some important information from the article for patients and their doctors below.

Gadolinium Storage Condition –
“Gadolinium storage condition” is the term proposed for gadolinium tissue deposition. The authors said, “Even in patients with normal renal function, in vivo clinical exposure to gadolinium chelates results in gadolinium incorporation into body tissues such as bone matrix or brain tissues.” (See references below.)

It appears that gadolinium accumulation varies depending on the stability of the agent used.  As with NSF, the least stable GBCAs appear to be most likely to result in gadolinium storage condition, and stable agents either do not cause it or cause it at a very low level.  The clinical significance of gadolinium tissue deposition remains incompletely understood.

Gadolinium Deposition Disease –
“Gadolinium deposition disease” is the name proposed for a disease process observed in subjects with normal or near normal renal function who develop persistent symptoms that arise hours to 2 months after the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).  In these cases, no preexistent disease or subsequently developed disease of an alternate known process is present to account for the symptoms.

The authors note that some of these patients are likely to have coexistent gadolinium storage condition, as described above, but gadolinium deposition disease is also described after a single administration of GBCA.  The causal relationship has not been fully established, but it is under investigation.

The article references our MRI Gadolinium-Toxicity support group and notes that the group has reported symptoms it considers to be consistent with the known toxic effects of gadolinium.  They also cite the results of our 2014 Symptom Survey which suggests an association between chronic effects and GBCA exposure.

The authors said, in their experience, “Symptoms of gadolinium deposition disease are similar but not identical to those observed in NSF”.   They said that their preliminary investigation has convinced them that this phenomenon is a true disease process. (more…)